Kansas City Golf Association Logo
News Category - Rules

Decisions, Decisions, Decisions

Categories: Rules, Spotlight | Posted: April 29, 2013 | No Comments »

Yes the Rules of Golf can be fun. The Referee likes to spend evenings perusing through Decisions on the Rules of Golf for the strange, interesting and sometimes funny facts. Here is the latest I like to refer to as: Let me just clean this up a little…

Decision 1-2/0.7: Meaning of “Sole Purpose of Caring for the Course”

Q. What is the meaning of the phrase “sole purpose of caring for the course” in Exception 2 to Rule 1-2?

A. The phrase “sole purpose of caring for the course” in the Exception refers to the performance of acts that are encouraged in the Etiquette Section of the Rules of Golf provided they are taken at the appropriate time and in a manner permitted by the Rules. The provisions of Rule 1-2 do not prevent a player from taking acts that conform with the Etiquette Section, so long as the player does so for the sole purpose of caring for the course without intentionally influencing the movement of a ball, or the physical conditions affecting play, of a player in the player’s group or match.

For example, while a player may not smooth the ragged edge of a hole or tap down spike marks in order to influence the movement of a ball of an opponent, fellow-competitor or partner, the player may generally smooth the ragged edge of a hole or tap down spike marks as a courtesy to playersin following groups or matches, or for care of the course (see Decision 1-2/3.5). Similarly, while a player may not press down a piece of turf in the area in which a ball in motion may come to rest or in the area in which a ball is to be dropped or placed with the intention of influencing the movement of the ball, a player generally may attempt to tidy up the course by repairing divot holes and/or replacing divots that do not affect play of the hole by a player in the player’s group or match (see Decision 1-2/8). (New)

The USGA, in conjunction with The R&A in St. Andrews, Scotland, writes, interprets and maintains the Rules of Golf to guard the tradition and integrity of the game. The two organizations are joint authors and owners of The Rules of Golf and Decisions on the Rules of Golf. Through an agreement with The R&A, the Rules jurisdiction of the USGA includes only the United States, its possessions and Mexico.

To learn more about The Rules of Golf check out the Rules and Decision section of the USGA’s website.

Decisions, Decisions, Decisions

Categories: Rules, Spotlight | Posted: April 12, 2013 | No Comments »

Yes the Rules of Golf can be fun. The Referee likes to spend evenings perusing through Decisions on the Rules of Golf for the strange, interesting and sometimes funny facts. Here is the latest I like to refer to as: Woulda, coulda, shoulda…

Decision 8-1/8: Comment About Club Selection After Stroke

Q. After playing a stroke, a player says : “I should have used a 5-iron.” Was the player in breach of Rule 8-1?

A. If the statement was made casually, there was no breach. If the statement was made to another player who had a shot to play from about the same position, there was a breach.

To learn more about The Rules of Golf check out the Rules and Decision section of the USGA’s website.

Decisions, Decisions, Decisions

Categories: Rules, Spotlight | Posted: February 27, 2013 | 1 Comment »

Yes, the Rules of Golf can be fun.  The Referee likes to spend evenings perusing through the Decisions on the Rules of Golf for the strange, interesting and sometimes funny facts.

Here’s the latest I like to refer to as:

Am I the last one here?…

Decision 6-3a/2

Time of Starting; All Competitors Must Be Present

Q. In a stroke-play competition, A, B and C were drawn by the Committee to play together starting at 9 am. A and B were present at the appointed time. C arrived at 9:02 am after A and B had played from the teeing ground, but just in time to play in the correct order. What is the ruling?

A. As C arrived and was ready to play within five minutes after his starting time, he incurred a penalty of two strokes for failure to start at the time established by the Committee (Rule 6-3a). If C had arrived more than five minutes after his starting time, the penalty would have been disqualification. In either case if the Committee determines that exceptional circumstances had prevented C from starting on time, there is no penalty.

All competitors in a group must be present and ready to play at the time established by the Committee, in this case 9:00 am. The order of play is not relevant. (Revised)

Decisions, Decisions, Decisions

Categories: Rules, Spotlight | Posted: January 14, 2013 | No Comments »

Yes, the Rules of Golf can be fun.  The Referee likes to spend evenings perusing through the Decisions on the Rules of Golf for the strange, interesting and sometimes funny facts.

Here’s the latest I like to refer to as:

Didn’t I know you in a previous life?

Decision 23/1

When Loose Impediment Transformed into Obstruction

Loose impediments may be transformed into obstructions through process of  construction or manufacturing. For example, a log (loose impediment)  that has been split and has legs attached has been changed by construction into a bench (obstruction); or a piece of wood (loose impediment) becomes an obstruction when manufactured into a charcoal briquette.

Decisions, Decisions, Decisions

Categories: Rules, Spotlight | Posted: December 21, 2012 | No Comments »

Yes, the Rules of Golf can be fun.  The Referee likes to spend evenings perusing through the Decisions on the Rules of Golf for the strange, interesting and sometimes funny facts.

Here’s the latest I like to refer to as:

 Found it…Darn it…

 Decision 27-2/2

Member of Committee Finds Player’s Original Ball; Player Prefers to Continue with Provisional Ball

Q. Is a member of a Committee or a forecaddie obliged to inform a player that his original ball has been found, even if it is clear that the player does not plan to search for it because he would prefer to continue play with the provisional ball he has played? 

 A. Yes.

Decisions, Decisions, Decisions

Categories: Rules, Spotlight | Posted: December 14, 2012 | 1 Comment »

Yes, the Rules of Golf can be fun.  The Referee likes to spend evenings perusing through the Decisions on the Rules of Golf for the strange, interesting and sometimes funny facts.

Here’s the latest I like to refer to as:

 It’s not the wrong that you think it is, but it’s still wrong…

 Decision 15/4

 Player Lifts Ball, Sets it Aside and Plays it from Where Set Aside

Q. A player marks the position of his ball on the putting, lifts the ball and sets it aside. By mistake, he putts the ball from the spot at which he set it aside. What is the ruling? 

 A. When a ball is lifted under Rule 20-1, it is out of play – see Definition of “Ball in Play.” When the player played a stroke with his ball while it was out of play, he played a wrong ball (Rule 15-3).

In match play, the player lost the hole (Rule 15-3a).

In stroke play, he incurred a penalty of two strokes and was required to correct the error before playing from the next tee; otherwise, he would be disqualified (Rule 15-3b).

Decisions, Decisions, Decisions…

Categories: Rules, Spotlight | Posted: November 28, 2012 | No Comments »

Yes, the Rules of Golf can be fun.  The Referee likes to spend evenings perusing through the Decisions on the Rules of Golf for the strange, interesting and sometimes funny facts.

Here’s the latest I like to refer to as:

Am I the last one here?…

Decision 6-3a/2

Time of Starting; All Competitors Must Be Present

Q. In a stroke-play competition, A, B and C were drawn by the Committee to play together starting at 9 am. A and B were present at the appointed time. C arrived at 9:02 am after A and B had played from the teeing ground, but just in time to play in the correct order. What is the ruling?

A. As C arrived and was ready to play within five minutes after his starting time, he incurred a penalty of two strokes for failure to start at the time established by the Committee (Rule 6-3a). If C had arrived more than five minutes after his starting time, the penalty would have been disqualification. In either case if the Committee determines that exceptional circumstances had prevented C from starting on time, there is no penalty.

All competitors in a group must be present and ready to play at the time established by the Committee, in this case 9:00 am. The order of play is not relevant. (Revised)

Anchors Away

Categories: Headlines, Rules, Rules & Competitions, Spotlight, Top Story | Posted: November 28, 2012 | No Comments »
11/28/2012
Far Hills, N.J. — The USGA announced this morning that a new addition to the Rules of Golf will likely take effect in January 2016.  The proposed rules change was presented by the United States Golf Association and the R & A in a joint press conference.  Together the two bodies jointly govern the rules of golf worldwide.  Here is an excerpt of the joint press release:
 
USGA, R&A Propose Rule to Prohibit Anchoring the Club during Stroke
 
The change would go into effect in 2016, allowing golfers a transition period for conforming to the new Rule.
 
By USGA
FOLLOWING A YEAR-LONG REVIEW and a high-level public discussion and interest in the topic, the USGA and The R&A – golf’s governing bodies – have proposed a change to the Rules of Golf that would prohibit anchoring a club during a stroke.
Although anchoring the club is not new, until recently it was uncommon and typically seen as a method of last resort by a small number of players.  In the last two years, however, more and more players have adopted the anchored stroke.  Golf’s governing bodies have observed this upsurge at all levels of the game and noted that more coaches and players are advocating this method.  The decision by the USGA and The R&A to act now is based on a strong desire to reverse this trend and to preserve the traditional golf stroke.
“As governing bodies, we monitor and evaluate playing practices and developments in golf, to ensure that the Rules of Golf continue to preserve the fundamental characteristics of the game,” said USGA Executive Director Mike Davis.
The proposed Rule 14-1b would prohibit a stroke made with the club or a hand gripping the club held directly against the player’s body, or with a forearm held against the body to establish an anchor point that indirectly anchors the club.
The new Rule would not alter current equipment rules and would allow the continued use of all conforming golf clubs, including belly-length and long putters, provided such clubs are not anchored during a stroke.  Just as importantly, the new Rule narrowly targets only a few types of strokes, while preserving a golfer’s ability to play a wide variety of strokes in his or her style.
“Throughout the 600-year history of golf, the essence of playing the game has been to grip the club with the hands and swing freely at the ball,” said Davis.  “Anchoring the club alters the nature of that challenge.”
In order to uphold this basic principle underlying the Rules, there have been previous Rules amendments that addressed the definition of the stroke.  A century ago, the Rules stated that the ball must be fairly struck and not be pushed, scraped or spooned, while a change in 1968 prohibited the “croquet” style of putting.
Videos, photos, illustrations and frequently asked questions about the types of strokes that would be permitted or prohibited under the Rules are available at www.usga.org/anchoring.
The governing boards of both the USGA and The R&A are expected to act on the proposal in early 2013, allowing for additional discussion and feedback from across the golf community.  If approved, the Rule will go into effect on January 1, 2016, which is the start of the next four-year revision cycle of the Rules of Golf.  This extended period would give golfers of all levels ample opportunity to adapt their strokes, if necessary, to meet the requirements of the new Rule, which preserves the very nature of the golf swing for today’s players and for future generations who take up the game.
“The recent sharp increase in the use of anchored strokes and the potential for that trend to continue down the road threaten to undermine the long-standing nature of what it means to make a golf swing,” said Peter Dawson, chief executive of The R&A.  “We believe that the proposed Rule will preserve the essential character of the game that has enabled it to thrive for centuries.”
 
Additional Resources on the Proposed Rules Change
 
We want to know your thoughts! Comment below and join the conversation on anchoring.
 
-

Decisions, Decisions, Decisions

Categories: Rules, Spotlight | Posted: October 29, 2012 | No Comments »

Yes, the Rules of Golf can be fun. The Referee likes to spend evenings perusing through the Decisions on the Rules of Golf for the strange, interesting and sometimes funny facts.

Here’s the latest I like to refer to as:

Not again…

Decision 13-4/9

Player Creates and Smoothes Footprints in Bunker Prior to Making Stroke

Q. A player’s ball lies in a bunker and a rake has been left in another part of the bunker. Prior to making his stroke in the bunker, the player retrieves the rake. Having lifted the rake, the player smoothes footprints that he has just created, and some others in the process. What is the ruling?

A. There is no penalty provided the smoothing was done for the sole purpose of caring for the course and nothing was done to breach Rule 13-2 in relation to the player’s next stroke (see Exception 2 to Rule 13-4).

If, however, a player is regularly creating and smoothing footprints close to his ball prior to making strokes from bunkers, it would be appropriate to question the player about the purpose of the smoothing. In such circumstances, the smoothing might be for the purpose of gaining knowledge of the condition of the bunker rather than being for the sole purpose of caring for the course. If so, the player would be in breach of Rule 13-4a for testing the condition of the hazard. (New)

Decisions, Decisions, Decisions

Categories: Rules, Spotlight | Posted: September 28, 2012 | No Comments »

Yes, the Rules of Golf can be fun.  The Referee likes to spend evenings perusing through the Decisions on the Rules of Golf for the strange, interesting and sometimes funny facts.

Here’s the latest I like to refer to as:

We ran out of paint…

Decision 26/3

Unmarked Water Hazard

Q.An unmarked ditch on the left of a hole is in bounds, but the left-hand margin is out of bounds. Accordingly, it is impossible to drop behind the water hazard under Rule 26-1b. A player’s ball comes to rest in the ditch. Is the player restricted to playing the ball as it lies or proceeding under Rule 26-1a?

A.It is the responsibility of the Committee to define accurately the margins of water hazards and lateral water hazards – see Rule 33-2a. However, if the Committee has not done so, the ditch is, by definition, a lateral water hazard and the player should be permitted to proceed under Rule 26-1c(i).

The USGA, in conjunction with The R&A in St. Andrews, Scotland, writes, interprets and maintains the Rules of Golf to guard the tradition and integrity of the game. The two organizations are joint authors and owners of The Rules of Golf and Decisions on the Rules of Golf. Through an agreement with The R&A, the Rules jurisdiction of the USGA includes only the United States, its possessions and Mexico.

To learn more about the Rules of Golf, please visit the Rules and Decision section of the USGA’s website.